Play Bazaar Involved in Three Divorced
Opposition of three divorced fees, MP from Hyderabad and AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi stated that this was once a violation of the structure and Article 14 and 15. If Modi executive is sympathetic to Muslim ladies, then why do not they love the Hindu ladies of Kerala?
Union regulation Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad(Play Bazaar) positioned three divorce charges on the Lok Sabha table on Friday to get rid of Muslim ladies from triple divorce. After this, opposition events, together with Congress, began a ruckus in the apartment. Opposition of three divorced fees, MP from Hyderabad and AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi stated that this was once a violation of the constitution and Article 14 and 15. If Modi government is sympathetic to Muslim women, then why do not they love the Hindu women of Kerala? After all, what's your role on Sabarimala?
MP Asaduddin Owaisi, even as questioning the three Divorce invoice, mentioned that if a non-Muslim is put within the case, then he's going to be sentenced to one yr's sentence and a 3 yr sentence for Muslims. Shouldn't be this a violation of Article 14 and 15? This invoice will simplest punish the Muslim men. You are not within the curiosity of Muslim women, but you are putting a burden on them.
Owaisi(Satta King) said that the judgment of the Supreme courtroom on three divorces is obvious that if a man or woman offers three divorce at a time, the marriage is not going to ruin. In one of these approach, the husband will go to jail for the bill, and he's going to be in prison for 3 years. Who will provide alimony to a Muslim lady? Will you (the federal government) give?
Owaisi mentioned that you've got a lot love with Muslim females. Why isn't the love of Kerala's Hindu females? Why are you towards the choice of Sabarimala? This is going fallacious.
Prior to Owaisi, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor mentioned within the condo that I oppose the bill being awarded. He mentioned that I do not aid the three divorces, however i'm antagonistic to this bill. Tharoor said, this invoice is against the constitution, where the civil and crook law has been merged.
He mentioned that if it's a crime to divorce a spouse with the aid of divorce in view of the government, then why is it constrained best to the Muslim group? He stated that why this legislation must be applied to all the communities. It was once stated on behalf of the Congress that the federal government shouldn't be benefiting Muslim ladies through this invoice, but it is punishing simplest Muslim men.
Union regulation Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad(Play Bazaar) positioned three divorce charges on the Lok Sabha table on Friday to get rid of Muslim ladies from triple divorce. After this, opposition events, together with Congress, began a ruckus in the apartment. Opposition of three divorced fees, MP from Hyderabad and AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi stated that this was once a violation of the constitution and Article 14 and 15. If Modi government is sympathetic to Muslim women, then why do not they love the Hindu women of Kerala? After all, what's your role on Sabarimala?
MP Asaduddin Owaisi, even as questioning the three Divorce invoice, mentioned that if a non-Muslim is put within the case, then he's going to be sentenced to one yr's sentence and a 3 yr sentence for Muslims. Shouldn't be this a violation of Article 14 and 15? This invoice will simplest punish the Muslim men. You are not within the curiosity of Muslim women, but you are putting a burden on them.
Owaisi(Satta King) said that the judgment of the Supreme courtroom on three divorces is obvious that if a man or woman offers three divorce at a time, the marriage is not going to ruin. In one of these approach, the husband will go to jail for the bill, and he's going to be in prison for 3 years. Who will provide alimony to a Muslim lady? Will you (the federal government) give?
Owaisi mentioned that you've got a lot love with Muslim females. Why isn't the love of Kerala's Hindu females? Why are you towards the choice of Sabarimala? This is going fallacious.
Prior to Owaisi, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor mentioned within the condo that I oppose the bill being awarded. He mentioned that I do not aid the three divorces, however i'm antagonistic to this bill. Tharoor said, this invoice is against the constitution, where the civil and crook law has been merged.
He mentioned that if it's a crime to divorce a spouse with the aid of divorce in view of the government, then why is it constrained best to the Muslim group? He stated that why this legislation must be applied to all the communities. It was once stated on behalf of the Congress that the federal government shouldn't be benefiting Muslim ladies through this invoice, but it is punishing simplest Muslim men.
Comments
Post a Comment